Context management
Context management for the work you actually do
Two different things share one name
The enterprise version of this category is about governing structured data at company scale: which tables mean what, who may query them, how lineage is tracked. Buyers are data platform teams.
The other version — the one that ruins your Tuesday — is that you cannot remember which Slack thread had the decision, your AI assistant knows nothing about your project, and the answer to "what did we agree?" is spread across a channel, an email, and a call nobody wrote up.
Jarvis is built for the second one. No warehouse, no catalogue, no data team required.
What Jarvis treats as context
Context is not documents. It is the conversation around the documents — the part that explains why the doc says what it says.
Conversations
Slack channels, DMs, and threads. Where most decisions are actually made and where none of them are written down.
The thread with the customer, the vendor, the contract. Usually the only record of an external commitment.
Meetings
What was said on the call, filed next to the thread that led to it. See /meeting-assistant.
Docs and tickets
Confluence, Notion, Jira, and Linear — the structured record, used to anchor the unstructured one.
People and ownership
The org chart and who owns which area, so "who do I ask about this?" has an answer.
Your own history
What you have been working on, accumulating as you work. This is what makes it useful on day 200, not just day one.
Three layers, deliberately separated
Pooling everything into one index is the easy build and the wrong one. An engineer should not surface marketing's numbers by accident, and your DMs should not become company knowledge because you happened to mention a decision in one.
Company
Vision, goals, and direction — the things every new person is told once in week one and then has to infer for a year.
Team
Current priorities, who owns which direction, what was decided last sprint and why the alternative was rejected.
Personal
Your own accumulating work context: your threads, your calls, your open loops. Never pooled into the shared layers.
On privacy
Your personal layer is yours. It informs the answers Jarvis gives you without being readable by teammates or admins, and the store itself sits on your own machine rather than in a vendor's cloud.
Context that gets delivered, not just stored
A context store nobody queries is a more expensive filing cabinet. Jarvis exposes what it holds in the three places you would actually reach for it:
Ask it in Slack
Tag Jarvis where the work already happens and get a cited answer back in the thread.
Let your AI tools query it
Over MCP, so Claude Code and any other client can pull context themselves instead of waiting for you to paste it. How the MCP server works.
Have it act
Context is what makes an action safe to take. Knowing who owns an access is what lets Jarvis open the right chat, write the intro, and find a slot the three of you share.
Honest limits
What we're not claiming
Jarvis is in early access. Slack, Gmail, and meeting notes are what it syncs today; docs, tickets, and identity providers are on the roadmap rather than shipped, and we would rather say so here than let you find out after signing up.
It also will not invent an answer. When the context is not there, it says so and points you at the person most likely to know — a confident wrong answer costs more than an honest gap.
Try Jarvis on your Mac
Connect your chats, email and calendar. Jarvis tells you what to do first.
Get startedRead next